EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF THE CLASSICAL DIVIDEND POLICY THEORIES IN EU-28 COUNTRIES

Marilen Gabriel Pirtea, Eugen Axel Mihancea, Florin-Claudiu Botoc

Abstract


Dividend policies and their impact on company value represent a subject which attracted strong academic interest, with many researchers bringing their contributions at solving the discussion based on the standard theory. The main objective of the paper is to revisit the classical dividend theories in the context of the EU-28 countries over a 9 year timeframe (2009-2017) which is an extension of previous studies on the topic over the same geographical zone. The motivation of the study is to identify those factors which determine the dividend decisions for the companies comprised in the sample we used and compare the results to the previous studies on the topic to see whether the classical theories still stand or there are shifts towards other factors.  The results of the paper show that the lifecycle theory of dividends together with the pecking order theory and the available cashflow theory are still standing, and that both the accounting and market performance of the company have a significant impact on the level of dividends paid by the company.


Keywords


Dividends, Liquidity, Performance, Panel model, Signaling

References


Alstadsaeter, A., Jacob, M., & Michaely, R. (2017). Do dividend taxes affect corporate investment? Journal of Public Economics, 151, 74–83, USA. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.05.001

Consler, J., & Lepak, G. M. (2016). Dividend initiators, winners during 2008 financial crisis. Managerial Finance, 42(3), 212–224 Australia, doi:10.1108/MF-07-2015-0187

Dąbrowska J.F., Sawicka M.M. and Ulrichs M., (2019): Determinants of dividend payout decisions – the case of publicly quoted food industry enterprises operating in emerging markets, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Poland, DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2019.1631201

Di Giuli, A., Karmaziene, E. and Sekerci N., (2019), Common Ownership and Firm Dividend Policies, SSRN, USA, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3175247

Faccio M., and Lang L.H., (2002), The Ultimate Ownership of Western European Corporations, Journal of Financial Economics, USA, 65(3), 365-395.

Flynn, A., Grey C. and Donnelly, R., Management compensation contracts and distribution policies in the US technology sector, International Review of Financial Analysis (2019), USA, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2019.101403

Ho, H. (2003). Dividend policies in Australia and Japan. International Advances in Economic Research, 9(2), 91–100, USA. doi:10.1007/BF02295710

Ichim, C.E., „Corporate governance and its implications for financial reporting”, Ecoforum Vol. 6, Issue 1(10) (2017), Romania.

Kazmierska-Jozwiak, B. (2015). Determinants of dividend policy: Evidence from Polish Listed companies. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 473–477, USA. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212- 5671(15)00490-6 doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00490-6

Lobao J., Pacheco L., and Lajas T., (2020). "The dividend puzzle: testing the signalling hypothesis in a European context," International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(2), pages 202-226 USA,.

Matos, P.V., Barros, V. and Sarmento, J.M., (2020). "Does ESG affect the stability of dividend policies in Europe?” Sustainability - MDPI, 12(21), Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218804

Musa, H., Rech F., and Musová Z., (2019). The role of corporate governance in debt and dividend policies: case of Slovakia. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 16(2), 206-217, Ukraine. doi:10.21511/imfi.16(2).2019.18

Omar F., Ahmed N., (2019) Dividend policy and political uncertainty: Evidence from the US presidential elections, Research in International Business and Finance nr. 48 (2019) p. 201-209, USA, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.01

Shapiro, D., & Zhuang, A. (2015). Dividends as a signaling device and the disappearing dividend puzzle. Journal of Economics and Business, USA, 79, 62–81. doi:10.1016/j.jeconbus.2014.12.005

Simsek, Z. (2007). CEO tenure and organizational performance: an intervening model. Strategic Management Journal, 28(6), 653–662, USA. doi:10.1002/smj.599

Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005) The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal 48, 450–463, USA.

Von den Driesch, T., Eva Susanne da Costa, M., Christina Flatten, T., & Brettel, M. (2015). How CEO experience, personality, and network affect firms’ dynamic capabilities. European Management Journal, 33(4), 245–256, Scotland. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2015.01.003


Full Text: PDF

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.