RETAILERS' SUSTAINABLE COMMUNICATIONS. CASE STUDY ON THE ROMANIAN MARKET
Abstract
Identifying a consumer need to protect the environment, retailers considered that the implementation of sustainable principles in all stages of production processes, respectively in business strategies, is not only a first element of differentiation but also constitutes satisfaction of customers' needs and wishes. Thus, in recent years, especially in the field of consumer products, we are not only faced with the appearance of organic or green products, but also with an increase in the desire of retailers to get involved in the life of the community and to carry out social responsibility campaigns.
Currently, companies inform consumers about the sustainable actions they carry out through annual Sustainability Reports, which are carried out by international reporting standards, the best known of which is the Global Reporting Initiative.
In this article, we aimed to carry out a comparative analysis of the sustainable communication strategy that three of the retailers operating in the field of consumer goods in Romania have: Lidl Group, Kaufland Group, and Profi Rom.
Keywords
References
Alvarez-Rodriguez, C., Martin-Gamboa, M., & Iribarren, D. (2019). Sustainability-oriented efficiency of retail supply chains: A combination of Life Cycle Assessment and dynamic network Data Envelopment Analysis. Science of the Total Environment.
Baxter, R., Mallett, O., & Kallbekken, S. (2020). The Use of the Global Reporting Initiative by European retail companies: A comparative analysis. Sustainability, 12(8), 3417. DOI: 10.3390/su12083417
Bădescu, C. (2022, 05 31). Top 25 Retaileri: Lidl e lider la încasări, Kaufland la profit, iar La Cocoș la dinamică. Profi trece peste Carrefour Hypermarket; Penny accelerează, iar Mega pierde viteză. Preluat de pe Revista-Piața: https://www.revista-piata.ro/retail/info-retail/item/17326-top-25-retaileri-lidl-e-lider-la-incasari-kaufland-la-profit-iar-la-cocos-la-dinamica-profi-trece-peste-carrefour-penny-accelereaza-iar-mega-pierde-viteza
Bhattacharya, C., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: when, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. Calif. Management Review, 47, 9-24.
BusinessWire. (2016, 06 30). Global Retail Industry Worth USD 28 Trillion by 2019 - Analysis, Technologies & Forecasts Report 2016-2019 - Research and Markets. Preluat de pe Business Wire: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20160630005551/en/Global-Retail-Industry-Worth-USD-28-Trillion
Chen, Y., Gao, J., & Gao, J. (2019). The impact of sustainable communication on consumer purchase intention: The mediating role of brand image and green trust. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 358-366.
Dyllick, T., & Muff, K. (2016). Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: Introducing a typology from business-as-usual to true business sustainability. Organization & Environment, 29(2), 156-174.
Ehgartner, U. (2018). Discourses of the food retail industry: Changing understanding of â€the consumer†and strategies for sustainability. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2352-5509.
Ferreira, A., Pinheiro, M. D., de Brito, J., & Mateus, R. (2019). Decarbonizing strategies of the retail sector following the Paris Agreement. Energy Policy.
GRI. (2020). Annual Report 2020. Preluat de pe Global Reporting Initiative: https://www.globalreporting.org/reports/2020-gri-annual-report/
Group. Schwartz. (2022). Business area. Preluat de pe Group Schwartz: https://gruppe.schwarz/en
Harrison, R., Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (2005). The Ethical Consumer. London: Sage.
Kaufland.ro. (2021). Sustainability Report. Kaufland.
Kaufland.ro. (2022). Kaufland desemnată â€Cea mai transparentă È™i performantă companie în direcÈ›ia sustenabilității†pentru al cincilea an consecutiv. Preluat de pe Despre Kaufland: https://despre.kaufland.ro/presa/comunicate-de-presa/presse-detail.y=2022.m=12.n=raport-de-sustenabilitate-2021.html
Keay, A., & Iqbal, T. (2018). Sustainability in Larke UK Listed Retail Companies: A Sectoral Analysis. Deakin Law Review, 23, 209-244.
Kenton, W. (2021, 12 06). Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry: Definition, Types, and Profitability. Preluat de pe Investopedia: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fastmoving-consumer-goods-fmcg.asp
Kim, Y., Hsu, J., Lee, S., & Kim, J. H. (2018). Sustainable retailing in a sharing economy: Consumers perception of sustainability and sharing economy in the retail industry. Sustainability, 10(4), 1059.
Lidl.com. (2022). Sustainability at Lidl. Preluat de pe Lidl.com: https://info.lidl/en/responsibility
Lidl.ro. (2022). Raport de sustenabilitate Lidl România. Preluat de pe Lidl.ro: https://www.lidl.ro/ro/cataloage/raport-sustenabilitate-an-financiar-2021/view/overview/page/1
Michaelis, L. (2003). The role of business in sustainable consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11, 915-921.
Naidoo, M., & Gasparatos, A. (2018). Corporate Environmental Sustainability in the retail sector: Drivers, strategies and performance measurement. Journal of Cleaner Production.
Profi.ro. (2021). Raport de sustenabilitate. Timișoara: Profi România.
Profi.ro. (2022). Companie. Preluat de pe Profi.ro: https://www.profi.ro/companie/
Sassatelli, R. (2007). Consumer Culture: History, Theory and Politics (ed. First). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Smith, E. E., & Perks, S. (2010). A perceptual study of the impact of green practice implementation on business functions. Southern African Business review, 14(3), 1-29.
Spaargaren, G. (2011). Theories of practices: agency, technology, and culture. Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order. Global Environmental Change: Human Policy Dimensions, 21, 813-822.
Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5, 131-153.
Yu, W., & Ramakrishnan, R. (2009). An assessment of operational efficiency of retail firms in China. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(2), 109-122.
WCED. (1987). Our Common Future. World Commission on Environmental and Development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.