IS SECTORAL SHIFTS HYPOTHESIS VALID IN THE TURKISH ECONOMY?
Abstract
The aim of this study is to analyze reasons of unemployment and the validity of sectoral shift hypothesis developed by Lilien for the Turkish economy between years 2005 and 2014. The causal linkage between variables is analyzed by Toda–Yamamoto Granger causality, frequency domain causality and asymmetric causality test methods.
The results obtained from all tests show that the main reasons of unemployment in the Turkish economy are the cyclical factors. It is not possible to speak about validity of sectoral shifts hypothesis in the economy. The intensity and direction of interactions between macroeconomic variables may differ due to time frequencies. The existence of causality may disappear in the long run while it exists in the short run. Also conventional causality analysis methods do not decompose the causality into positive and/or negative shocks and so they could not explain the direction of causality. In order to test causation linkage between variables and to find direction of causality in different shock types we employ recently developed causality analysis methods which would increase the quality of the study.
Keywords
References
Aaronson, D., Rissman, E. and Sullivan, D. (2004) Can Sectoral Reallocaiton Explain the Jobless Recovery?, Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 28(2), pp.36-39. https://chicagofed.org/~/media/publications/economic-perspectives/2004/ep-2-qtr-2004-part-3-pdf.pdf.
Abraham, K.G. and Katz, L.F. (1986) Cyclical Unemployment: Sectoral Shifts or Aggregate Disturbances?, Journal of Political Economy, 94, pp.507-522. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1833046?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Blackley, P. R. (2000) The Impact of Sectoral Shifts in Investment on Unemployment in U.S. Labor Markets, Atlantic Economic Journal, 28(4), pp.435-449. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02298396#page-1
Brainard, S. L. and Cutler, D. M. (1993) Sectoral Shifts and Cyclical Unemployment Reconsidered, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(1), pp.219-243. http://qje.oxfordjournals.org/content/108/1/219.abstract
Breitung, J. and Candelon, B. (2006) Testing For Short and Long-Run Causality: A Frequency Domain Approach, Journal of Econometrics, 12, pp.363-378. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030440760500059X
Brunello, G. (1991) Mismatch and Labour Mobility in Mismatch in Japan, (Ed: F. Padoa-Schioppa), (pp.140-179), Cambridge Ãœniv. Press, London/New York.
Caporale, T., Doroodian, K. and Abeyratne, M.R.M. (1996) Cyclical Unemployment: Sectoral Shifts or Aggregate Disturbances? A Vector Autoregression L, Applied Economics Letters, 3, pp.127-130. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/135048596356852?journalCode=rael20#.Vw_6d3rLLrw
Chiarini, B. and Piselli, P. (2000) Unemployment, Wage Pressure and Sectoral Shifts: Permanent and Temporary Consequences of Intersectoral Shocks, Journal of Policy Modeling, 22(7), pp.777-799. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161893800000326
Ciner, C. (2011) Eurocurrency Interest Rate Linkages: A Frequency Domain Analysis, International Review of Economics and Finance, 20, pp.498-505. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056010000948
Davis, S. J. (1987) Fluctuations in the Pace of Labor Reallocation, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 27, pp.355-402. http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/steven.davis/pdf/12.pdf
Efron, B. (1979) Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at The Jackknife, Annals of Statistics, 7, pp.1-26.
Friedman, T. L. (2000) The Lexus and Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization, Macmillan, New York.
Garonna, P. and Sica, F G. M. (2000) Intersectoral Labour Reallocations and Unemployment in Italy, Labour Economics, 7(6), pp.711-728.
Geweke, J. (1982) Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback Between Multiple Time Series, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, pp.304-313. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2287238?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Groenewold, N. and Hagger, A.J. (1998) The Natural Unemployment Rate in Australia since the Seventies, The Economic Record, 74(224), pp.24-35. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1998.tb01901.x/abstract
Hacker, R. S. and Hatemi-J, A. (2005) A Test for Multivariate ARCH Effects, Applied Economics Letters, 12 (7), pp.411-417. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504850500092129
Hacker, R. S. and Hatemi-J, A. (2006) Tests for Causality Between Integrated Variables Based on Asymptotic and Bootstrap Distributions, Applied Economics, 38(13), pp.1489-1500. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504850500092129
Hatemi-J, A. (2003) A New Method to Choose Optimal Lag Order in Stable and Unstable VAR Models, Applied Economics Letters, 10(3), pp.135–137. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1350485022000041050?journalCode=rael20
Hatemi-J, A. (2005) Bootstrap-Corrected Tests for Causality: Theory and Applications in Finance, Invited Key-speaker Presentation at II Simposio Nacional De Docentes En Finanzas, July 1315, Bogota. https://static.sys.kth.se/itm/wp/cesis/cesiswp223.pdf
Hatemi-J, A. and Roca, E. (2007), Equity Market Price Interdependence Based on Bootstrap Causality Tests: Evidence from Australia and its Major Trading Partners, Applied Financial Economics, 17(10), pp.827-835. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09603100600722144?journalCode=rafe20
Hatemi-J, A. and Roca, E. (2014) BRICs and PIGS in the Presence of Uncle
Sam and Big Brothers: Who Drive Who? Evidence Based on Asymmetric Causality Tests, Griffith Business School Discussion Papers Finance, ISSSN: 1836-8123.
Heaton, C. and Oslington, P. (2010) Micro vs Macro Explanations of post-war US Unemployment Movements, Economics Letters, 136, pp.87-91.
Hosoya, Y. (1992) The Decomposition and Measurement of the Interdependence Between Second-Order Stationary Process, Probability Theory and Related Fields, 88, pp.429-444.
Lilien, D. M. (1982) Sectoral Shifts and Cyclical Unemployment, Journal of Political Economy, 90(41), pp.777-793.
Loungani, P., Rush, M. and Tave, W. (1990) Stock Market Dispersion and Unemployment, Journal of Monetary Economics, 25(3), pp.367-388.
Lutkepohl, H. (2005) New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis, Springer, Berlin.
Medoff, J.L. (1983) U.S. Labor Markets: Imbalance, Wage Growth, and Productivity in the 1970’s, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, pp.87-128.
Mills, T.C., Pelloni, G. and Zervoyianni, A. (1995) Unemployment Fluctuations in the United States: Further Tests of the Sectoral-Shifts Hypothesis, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, pp.294-304.
Neelin, J. (1987) Sectoral Shifts and Canadian Unemployment, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(4), pp.718-723.
Palley, T. (1992) Sectoral Shifts and Cyclical Unemployment: A Reconsideration, Economic Inquiry, 30(1), pp.117-133.
Piselli, P. and D’Italia, B. (2000) Unemployment, Wage Pressure and Sectoral Shifts: Permanent and Temporary Consequences of Intersectoral Shocks, Journal of Policy Modelling, 22(7), pp.777-799.
Romer, C. and Romer, D. (1989) Does Monetary Policy Matter: A New Test in the Spirit of Friedman and Schwartz, National Breau of Economics, Macroeconomics Annual, pp.121-170.
Sakata, K. (2002) Sectoral Shifts and Cyclical Unemployment in Japan, Journal of Japanese and International Economies, 16, pp.227-252.
Sakata, K. and Kenzie, C. (2004) The Accumulation of Human Capital and the Sectoral Shifts Hypothesis for Different Age Groups, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 64(3-4), pp.459-465.
Samson, L. (1985) A Study of the Impact of Sectoral Shifts on Aggregate Unemployment in Canada, Canadian Journal of Economics, 18, pp.518-30.
Shinn, K. (1997) Inter- and Intrasectoral Shocks: Effects on the Unemployment Rate, Journal of Labor Economics, 15(2), pp.376-401.
Toda, H.Y. and Yamamoto, T. (1995) Statistical Inference in Vector Autoregressions with Possibly Integrated Processes, Journal of Econometrics, 66, pp.225-250.
Wigley, A. A. and Mıhçı, S. (2011) Determinants of Unemployment in Turkey for 1988-2007 Period: Sectoral Versus Aggregate Shocks, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 26(308), pp.9-28.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.