This paper has the goal to identify the specific role that various regulatory institutions of the labor market have on the variation of the macroeconomic indicators which describe the employment situation of the young people on the labor market in the North-East Region of Romania. In this research we have used statistic data provided by the National Institute of Statistics of Romania among which we have selected a series of relevant variables regarding the characterization of the public policies for the labor market and the legislation of employees’ protection. Their influence on the variation of the unemployment rate and the employment rate concerning the young people in the North-East Region was studied using the method of the statistics regression, undergoing a filtration using the Stepwise procedure, implemented within the informatics program SPSS.


Nord-Est Region; unemployment; youth; public policies; regression analysis


Bassanini, A., L. Nunziata and D. Venn (2009), "Job protection legislation and productivity growth in OECD countries," Economic Policy, 24(58): 349-402.

Booth, A.L., M. Francesconi and J. Frank (2002), “Temporary Jobs: Stepping Stones or Dead Ends?”, Economic Journal, 112(480): F189-F213.

Contini, B (2010). Youth Employment in Europe: Institutions and Social Capital Explains Better then Mainstream Economics, Discussion Paper No.4718. University of Torino

Clocotici Valentin (2014), Regresia liniară multiplă, Accessed at

Eurostat (2015). Regional statistics by NUTS classification. Accessed at

Hapenciuc Cristian Valentin, Condratov Iulian (2015), Empiric findings of the analysis in the dynamics of the youth unemployment in the North-East Region - Romania - European Union, The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration, Vol 15, No 2(22)

Heckman, J. L. (1999). The economics and econometrics of active labour market programs, in: Ashenfelter, O. and Card D. (eds.), Handbook of Labour Economics, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Heckman, J. J., G. J. Borjas (1980), “Does Unemployment Cause Future Unemployment? Definitions, Questions and Answers from a Continuous Time Model of Heterogeneity and State Dependence”, Economica,47(187): 247-83.

Heckman J. J., B. Singer (1984), A Method of Minimizing the Impact of Distributional Assumptions for Duration Data, Econometrica 52, 271–320.

Isengard, B (2003). Youth Unemployment: Individual Risk Factors and Institutional Determinants: A Case Study of Germany and the United Kingdom. Journal of Youth Studies, 6 (4), 357-77

INS. (2015). Baza de date TEMPO. Accessed at

Kluve, J. (2006). The effectiveness of European Active Labour Market Policy. RWI Discussion Paper(37).

Nickell, S., L. Nunziata, W. Ochel (2005), “Unemployment in the OECD since the 1960s. What do we Know?”, Economic Journal, 115 (500): 1-27.

Neumark, D. W. (2004). Minimum wages, labour market institutions and youth employment: a cross-national analysis. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 57(2), 223-248.

Ochel, W. (2008), “The Political Economy of Two-Tier Reforms of Employment Protection in Europe”, Cesifo Working paper, n. 2461.

OECD (1994), “The OECD Jobs Study”, OECD Publications, Paris.

OECD (1999), OECD Employment Outlook

Pastore Francesco, Luca Giuliani (2015), The determinants of youth unemployment. A panel data analysis, Discussion Papers- CRISEI, University of Naples "Parthenope", Italy,

Pastore, F. (2015), The Youth Experience Gap. Explaining National Differences in the School-to-Work Transition (2015), Physica Verlag, Heidelberg.

Pereira, Sonia C. (2003), “The Impact of Minimum Wages on Youth Employment .” European Economic Review, Vol. 47, No. 2

Vogel, J. (2002). European Welfare regimes and the transition to adulthood: A comparative and longitudinal perspective. Social Indicators Research, 59(3), 275–299

Full Text: PDF

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.